天鹅套索

‘Hong Kong Alliance’ found guilty of inciting subversion; verdict clarifies boundaries between free speech and national security_我的网站

笑看风云

一 |

West Kowloon Law Courts Building in Hong Kong Photo: VCG
The anti-China group "Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China", along with its former chairman and vice-chairpersons Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho Chun-yan and Chow Hang-tung, were charged with inciting others to subvert state power and have been remanded in custody since then. The local court in Hong Kong found two defendants guilty on Friday, and Ho pleaded guilty before the trial began, local media reported.
The central government's office for safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) voiced support for the court's lawful prosecution on Friday, saying that the verdict demonstrates the spirit of the rule of law and upholds the authority of the National Security Law (NSL) for Hong Kong.
The HKSAR government also welcomed the court's guilty verdict. HKSAR Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said that for a long time, the Hong Kong Alliance had deliberately sown seeds of hatred toward the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the central government in Hong Kong society. Through various means, it sought to incite feelings of dislike and hatred toward the CPC and the central government among members of the public, and to encourage the public to subvert state power, RTHK reported.
The defendants' long-standing conduct endangered national security, and their plot was plainly evident and had to be punished, Lee said.
Inciting subversion of state power is an extremely serious offense, he said. The HKSAR government has a responsibility to safeguard national security and will resolutely prevent, stop and punish acts and activities that endanger national security, Lee noted.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out how Hong Kong courts understand and apply the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, some legal experts said.
Looking back at the case, the prosecution and defense engaged in intense legal arguments over the boundaries between freedom of expression and national security, with the core dispute going to the constitutional and legal limits under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework, Willy Fu, a law professor who is also the director of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong & Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
In its closing submissions, the prosecution argued that the defendants' long-standing slogan of "ending one-party rule" was not merely a political advocacy campaign, but was essentially aimed at rejecting the leadership of the CPC and attempting to subvert the fundamental system of the state, Fu continued.
Such conduct, the prosecution argued, went far beyond the scope of freedom of expression protected by the Basic Law and the NSL for Hong Kong, and constituted an objective act of inciting subversion of state power through "unlawful means," Fu said.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out the Hong Kong courts' understanding and application of the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, Chu Kar-kin, a veteran commentator based in the HKSAR and member of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
Hong Kong judges likewise need to receive comprehensive and systematic education on China's national Constitution, Chu said.
The Constitution is the fundamental law of the state and the most important component of the constitutional order of the HKSAR. The core of the constitutional order of the state is the establishment of the CPC's position as the governing party. The Preamble to the Constitution makes it clear that the leadership by the CPC is the core and foundation of the constitutional order of the PRC, a spokesperson from the HKSAR government said on Friday.
The HKSAR is an inalienable part of the PRC. The state provides the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of Hong Kong, and the highest principle of "One Country, Two Systems" is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, the spokesperson said.
The HKSAR Government will resolutely safeguard the fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution and the security of state power, and will, in strict accordance with the principle of the rule of law, prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security with full force and in accordance with the law, the spokesperson added.
。流感病毒亲爱的家长朋友们，近期流感肆意猖狂，幼儿体质弱容易被传染，为了不被它偷袭，让我们一起来认识一下它吧：一什么是流感？流行性感冒，简称“流感”，分为甲、乙、丙、丁四型，甲型、乙型流感较为多见。

二 | 流感是一种传染性强、传播速度快的急性呼吸道传染病，家庭、学校等聚集性场所易引起传播。二流感与普通感冒有什么区别？流感更严重，更容易出现并发症三流感传播途径主要通过呼吸道传播，打喷嚏、咳嗽等飞沫传播，经口腔、鼻腔、眼睛等黏膜直接或间接接触感染。四治疗流感需注意如出现高热、尤其是家庭、学校聚集性发病，应及时就医，就医过程应全程佩戴口罩，尽量减少接触他人并居家休息。在医生的指导下合理使用抗病毒治疗。五如何有效预防流感？ 1、接种流感疫苗：接种流感疫苗是预防流感最有效的预防措施之一，可以显著减少感染的风险以及改善感染后的症状，从而降低接种者感染流感病毒和发生严重并发症的风险。建议儿童每年接种流感疫苗。因不具备终身免疫，推荐每年接种流感疫苗，尤其是老年人、慢性病患者。 2、保持健康的生活方式：规律作息、充足睡眠、健康饮食、适量运动，根据天气情况及时增减衣裳。 3、保持良好的个人卫生习惯：戴口罩、勤洗手、咳嗽或打喷嚏时用纸巾等遮住口鼻，避免接触呼吸道感染患者。预防流感 5、经常开窗通风，加强空气流通，流感季节尽量避免到人群密集场所活动。 6、出现发热、咳嗽、流涕等流感样症状时，应尽早就医，患者及陪护人员要戴口罩，避免交叉感染。六若确诊为流感，何时才能返园？一旦确诊为流感，需居家隔离休息，待体温恢复正常、其他流感样症状消失48小时后凭社区医院开具的复课返校证明方可回园。流感早认识，健康共守护，为了孩子的健康让我们共同努力做好流感的防控工作。流感早认识，健康共守护 END 撰写：蒋亮排版：洪晓瑜责任编辑：蒋亮王玺审核：刘心慧。

Current article:http://fuvirn.miaorediancuisuilianzouguang.cyou/6y81/20260826/4112.html

Published on:12:27:40